[Bug 1259852] Review Request: assertj-core - Library of assertions similar to fest-assert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259852



--- Comment #7 from Roman Mohr <roman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
> NON blocking issues:
> 
> [?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

Removed some implicit dependencies from BuildRequires.

Assertj can be used with junit or testng. I decided to add assertj as a
Requires. A developer can still just install the testng package and use it with
assertj. Are there better solutions for this scenario?

> 
> [!]: Latest version is packaged.
>  Please, consider to upgrading to 2.2.0 or better 2.3.0

I presume you meen 3.1.0 instead of 2.3.0.
I updated to 2.2.0. Want to go with that, as 2.2.0 and 3.1.0 are equally well
maintained and only 2.2.0 is java7 compatible. Maybe I should also add a
"assertj-core3" package?

> Suggestion:
> Please, remove maven-compiler-plugin
> 
> Please, remove
> %pom_xpath_inject "pom:project" "
>     <properties>
>         <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
>         <maven.compiler.source>1.7</maven.compiler.source>
>         <maven.compiler.target>1.7</maven.compiler.target>
xmvn resisted to accept any other way to tell it that it should use java7 mode.

>     </properties>"
>
> you can use
> %mvn_build -- -Dproject.build.sourceEncoding=UTF-8

Moved the sourceEncoding to the %mvn_build line

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]