[Bug 1258182] Review Request: go-compilers - Go language compilers for various architectures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258182

Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Looking into the .spec file, wouldn't it be better to reverse the virtual
provides, e.g.

compiler(go-compiler) -> go(compiler)
compiler(gcc-go) -> go(gcc-go)
compiler(golang) -> go(golang)

Or possibly go(comp9ler_gcc-go), go(compiler_golang)?

As far as I understand these are Go specific macros, so they should be in go()
format similarly to every other language specific macros.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]