https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230161 --- Comment #13 from Petr Šabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jens Lody from comment #12) > There's nothing wrong with requiring what I need to build, of course. > > I did not (yet) read the discussion, but one question pops up: > what's in the real actual minimal guaranteed buildroot ? > Obviously there must be something. Is there a list available somewhere ? > > Or do I have to expect real nothing ? > But that would also include compilers (if needed), probably autofoo-stuff > etc. Expect real nothing; that's the goal. In practice you can, at the moment, expect dnf and rpm at least. I can imagine that changing as well, though -- the buildroot could be populated from the outside. There's no list. If you need a compiler, buildrequire it. If you need autotools et al., buildrequire them. Personally, I would say this greatly simplifies the packaging work -- you don't have to remember any exceptions, check any lists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review