[Bug 1246846] Review Request: jmh - Java Microbenchmark Harness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246846



--- Comment #7 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Would it make sense to change the license to reflect each package?

$ diff -U 1 jmh.spec jmh-jonny.spec 
--- jmh.spec    2015-08-29 15:17:43.000000000 +0200
+++ jmh-jonny.spec    2015-08-29 17:41:32.230865881 +0200
@@ -7,3 +7,3 @@
 # 2 files have unknown license, reported @
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmh-dev/2015-August/002037.html
-License:       BSD and GPLv2 with exceptions
+License:       GPLv2 with exceptions
 URL:           http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jmh/
@@ -75,2 +75,3 @@
 Summary:       JMH Samples
+License:       BSD


$ rpm -qp --queryformat '%{NAME}: %{LICENSE}\n' jmh-*.noarch.rpm
jmh: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-core-benchmarks: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-core-ct: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-core-it: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-generator-annprocess: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-generator-asm: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-generator-bytecode: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-generator-reflection: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-javadoc: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-parent: GPLv2 with exceptions
jmh-samples: BSD

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]