https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100 gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #7) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #4) > The files that are compiled into the binary RPMs have the following > licenses: BSD (2 clause), LGPL v2, and MIT/X11 (BSD like). So the license field should be: BSD and LGPLv2 > is still wrong. I'm not sure where I got LGPLv3+ from. The license should be > LGPLv2. Fixed. from cryptominisat-4.5.3/LICENSE-LGPL LGPL v3 from cryptominisat-4.5.3/python/LICENSE MIT but says "CryptoMiniSat is under an LGPLv2 license. Please see LICENSE-LGPL file" ... seem outdate and everything is pretty confused ... thank you for your explanation, it seems all right. approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review