https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256100 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- ISSUES: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSD (2 clause)", "GPL (v2)", "*No copyright* MIT/X11 (BSD like)". 44 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1256100-cryptominisat4/licensecheck.txt see above, license field should be: BSD and GPLv2+ LGPLv2+ and MIT [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/cmake(cmake, qt5-qtlocation, qt5-qtbase) Please, use: %{_libdir}/cmake/cryptominisat4 Suggestion: cryptominisat4.src:87: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/lib%{name}* cryptominisat4.src:88: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake cryptominisat4.src:89: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/|%{_libdir}/|' can you patch cmake file, chaging the hardcoded ${dir}/lib with ${LIB_INSTALL_DIR} e.g. %{__cmake} -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=%{_prefix} -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=%{_libdir} -DALSO_BUILD_STATIC_LIB=OFF . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review