https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for all your work on this. I am not sure which binary package should really correctly own the datadir but overall the package looks fine to me now. The only outstanding/embarrassing remaining issue is: [!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. But this is also true for llvm and llvm34! The only solution I see is to get rid of /etc/ld.so.conf.d/%{name}-%{_arch}.conf and then add some RPATH to the binaries. But that is a bit of work to sort out... :-( Or maybe the llvm buildsystem (cmake) allows some way to add a prefix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review