https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253244 Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #5) > > 2. I'm not sure if uclibc in Fedora is a package or just another c lib, if > > just a package ,you still need to build it with %optflags > > (UCLIBC_EXTRA_CFLAGS) > Including %{optflags} would break busybox's goal to build smallest binary > possible, I think. After all, that's the reason why busybox links with > uClibc rather than glibc. Ok,-fno-stack-protector -nostdinc, I understand. > > 3. About these 2, should they be enabled? > > > > Wide Character Support (UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR) [N/y/?] n > > Locale Support (UCLIBC_HAS_LOCALE) [N/y/?] n > Again, I'm not sure how this would affect busybox. I should consult it's > maintainer. I've read the wchar code from uclibc, it's broken. ;) PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review