https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828 --- Comment #18 from bigswitch <rhosp-bugs-internal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks a lot Ihar! I'll address the new review comments today. We don't have a Delorean pull request yet. We asked for it earlier last week and got following reply from Haïkel. We don't totally understand the Red Hat Legal part, but looks like getting this review done is the first step. Please let us know if you have a different opinion :) Quote from Haïkel "We should move forward the fedora review for 2 reasons: * we need to review all the packages before inclusion in delorean to avoid broken packages like octavia * if your goal is to be included in RHEL-OSP, it's faster that way as packages that are not in Fedora requires licensing review from Red Hat Legal. I plan to request an exception for RDO packages but until then, it's faster this way." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review