[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492



--- Comment #2 from Guy Streeter <streeter@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Jiri,
 Thank you for reviewing this package.

The source is used to build two separate packages, python-libnuma and
python3-libnuma. That's the reason there are 2 specfiles.

I don't know what tito is. Is that something I need?
Why does rmpbuild need the specfiles in the top-level directory?

The package is designed to build and install from setup.py for platforms that
don't use rpm. It seems like packaging-specific files should be in their own
directory. tuna, python-linux-procfs, and python-schedutils all have this
directory layout.

The top-level Makefile has a target to build rpms.

thanks again,
--Guy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]