https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243758 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #3) > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-poms > /apacheds-jdbm, /usr/share/java/apacheds-jdbm > > Please fix this. This is a bug of fedora review tool. All owner/s directory are managed by our java tools. Please, see 1243758-apacheds-jdbm/files.dir files > [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > > Please do not add the License file yourself. Open https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-318 for missing license file > apacheds-jdbm.src: W: invalid-url Source0: apacheds-jdbm-2.0.0-M3.tar.xz > > Suggestion: You could use the upstream tarball of apacheds [1] and extract > the sources from there. This seems more elegant to me, because you could > specifiy a valid URL for the source, but I guess it's a matter of taste. > This would also fix the missing License file issue. Do not exist a upstream taraball for this package. And this is not included in apacheds 2.0.0.M20 src archive. You sure about this statement? > Could you also please indicate in a comment in the Spec file that this > package uses the jCharts variance of the BSD license. This would have helped > sorting out the correct license. This package is a fork of http://jdbm.sourceforge.net/ the original files are under BSD with attribution license. See: http://jdbm.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jdbm/jdbm/LICENSE.txt or better: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/jdbm.git/ (no more available for Fedora > 20) Open also a Bundling Exception https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/564 until jdbm will be completely replaced by mavibot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review