https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229349 --- Comment #7 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmavrogi@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > Note: No known owner of /usr/include/radcli > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/radcli Fixed. > [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. > Note: %define requiring justification: %{expand:%(echo "%%define > myversion %{version}" | sed 's/\./_/g')} Replaced with global. > [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > Note: Mock build failed > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint That was because of your previous suggestion to combine the description. Fixed. > [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros > Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. > See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools Done upstream. Will pull on the next update. https://github.com/radcli/radcli/commit/295464b056ee8c1de7b0bd1c8aca5b6f31660fe1 https://github.com/radcli/radcli/commit/cf8790b28261046dbc61c03cf01868d00504a694 > 1. If this is a fork, please fix missing license headers. I'm not sure what you mean here. I've added the headers into the license breakdown, if that's what you ask. > 2. AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found, fix them in the future. Done upstream. > 3. Fix [!] issues, and upload new SRPM and SPEC, Done. Updated links: http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/radcli.spec http://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/radcli-1.2.2-1.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review