Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf - Architecture independent parts of the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229180 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-04 04:51 EST ------- The problem with static linking of the freetype library is that texlive requires libttf (which is a part of the freetype project) but is neither a part of freetype nor freetype-devel we have in F7. So that the configure script will fallback to use an internal freetype which contains libttf. I made the TeXLive rpms compilable/installable and some basic testing shows that it works as expected, but some consistency fixes will be definitely needed. The new RPMs are here: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/texlive-texmf-2007-0.2.fc8.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/texlive/texlive-texmf.spec I'm going to file a separate review request for the TexLive binaries and add a dependency to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review