Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asl - Macro Assembler AS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240807 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-06-03 11:33 EST ------- :-) >> My first question was why you wanted the "something" part to be build55 rather >> than bld55. The upstream designation is bld55, not build55. it's just a packaging naming question for fedora packages names. i.e: a pacakge named bar-1.2-b5.tar.gz will be named for fedora inclusion like that -> bar-1.2-0.1.beta5.%{dist}.%{arch}.rpm Same thing for bld which'll become build. >> My second question was why you wanted the n in 0.n to be 1. I started with 1 >> (0.1bld55), and the SRPM I submitted for review was my eighth build release, >> so the n had been incremented to 8, thus 0.8bld55. If so, your Changelog section is not correct. Each build/fix you've done from your spec/pakcage files SHOULD be mentioned in the changelog section. As it's your eighth build release, your seven first SHOULD precede this last one in spec file. When you update or fix some features in your package you have to increment your release to n+1 and add lines (not replace the old) in changelog about this new build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review