https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250223 --- Comment #23 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #21) > Hello! > > I was AFK for few days..s and what Happened:( > > Zbyszek, thank you for review and for quick import (togehter with fixed > sources and rmeoved obsolate)! > > For issues rised by gil: > - %mvn_compat_version 'org.apache.lucene:*' 4 %{version} > is missing in %install [1] and is in format mayor_version whole_version > (according to docs, not %{version} 4 as settled above) > - source 1-3 including their use-cases can be safely removed > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/lucene4.git/tree/lucene4.spec?h=f23#n43 > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/lucene4.git/tree/lucene4.spec?h=f23#n343 > - isn't is valid also for main lucene package? > > If so, I will update immediately. As for putting jars back together.. I do > not see slightest reason to do so... SO unless somebody around really > insist... Then I would really like to keep them as they are... > > Thank you both! Hi as refrences use these: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059213 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/solr3.git/tree/solr3.spec#n106 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review