[Bug 1249078] Review Request: supernova - Use novaclient with multiple OpenStack nova environments the easy way

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078



--- Comment #5 from Pete Travis <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Okay, I've taken a closer look.  A few housekeeping items:

- s/novarc's/novarc files/ - or something.  Apostrophes are for possessives and
 contractions.  Pet peeve, not a review issue :) but seriously, please don't.
- s/%{__python/%{__python2/g .  Not a dealbreaker, but good practice, and won't
break your spec if the macro's defaults change.
  Also, using %{python2_version} instead of ?.? will make a py3 subpackage
easier down the road.
- some missed opportunities for %{name} in %files/*egg-info.  
- This needs a populated %doc or -docs subpackage.  Speaking of which, I see
the examples use rackspace auth - I'll put together a review for it.
- Use the %license macro for F21+.^FEPEL might need conditionals for this bit.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]