https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249416 Bug ID: 1249416 Summary: Package for uchardet? Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: jehan.marmottard@xxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi, I am unsure of the procedure to request new packages. Sorry by advance if opening a report was not the right way. mpv (already packaged in Fedora) recently got support for the uchardet library (https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/908) which is a lot more efficient and broad language support that enca. Enca has mostly support for latin and cyrillic languages with the exception of Chinese. In particular it won't recognize encodings made for Japanese or Korean (even though UTF-8 will hopefully be someday the only used, right now this is still far from the case). Moreover enca is officially in maintenance mode with no new features planned (cf. http://blog.cihar.com/archives/2014/10/20/enca-116/). On the other hand, uchardet is a C port of Mozilla encoding detection, and therefore recognize quite well a lot of encodings: https://github.com/BYVoid/uchardet License is Mozilla Public License Version 1.1. I think that uchardet (and similar libs) should supersede enca for the FOSS distributions to be used worldwide. Right now, mplayer/mpv/vlc,etc. none of the video players are able to read most Japanese and Korean subtitles without user tweaking. Same for text editors, etc. (right now gedit for instance is unable t recognize files found on the web in EUC-KR). Would it be possible to package uchardet? Thanks! Note: fedora already has python-chardet and jchardet/juniversalchardet, respectively Python and Java ports of Mozilla C++ code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review