https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249368 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #4) > (In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #3) > > As it currently stands you don't build install or package anything for > > python 2, despite the main package being a python2 package... > > Yes, so my thinking was...I wanted to build it as a python3-only package for > now, but have the ability to add python2 support later if someone needed it. > Thus, I didn't want to name the main package python3-pyqtgraph and have to > rename it later. Is there a better way to do this, or should I just not > bother and build both python2 and python3 now? Honestly, it's very little extra work to build it for py2 now, that I think you should just do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review