[Bug 1245640] Review Request: msed - Tools to manage the activation and use of self encrypting drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245640



--- Comment #1 from Till Hofmann <hofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Minor comments/questions after a first glance:

- Why do you create backups during patching?
- You use "buildconf x86_64" on ALL arch'es, are you sure this is intended? It
certainly looks odd.
- You can use a URL pointing to github as Source0 URL instead of using a local
file, for details see [1] (although this probably won't work, see next
comment).
- It seems like you need to have the full git repository in order to specify
the GIT_VERSION correctly. Couldn't you instead define the version when calling
make (e.g. by defining additional CPPFLAGS)? I understand this would require
some patching, but it seems like the cleaner solution.
- Are the patches generic or are these Fedora-specific patches? If they are
generic, are they included upstream? Did you send them upstream?


[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]