https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244514 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.micheal@xxxxxxx> --- > the real snappy Blasphemy! =:-) *g* http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/?q=snappy http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/snappy.git/tree/ > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/snappy "SnapPy is a program …" and not only a Python Module. Hence it would not be subject to Fedora's naming guidelines for Python modules. Still it would conflict with the existing "snappy" package. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Conflicting_Package_Names > python-python-snappy Asking on packaging@ list could be an idea. If there were a 2nd python-snappy package (and python3-snappy, too), I'd favour a naming like python-snappy-bindings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review