https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Issues: ======= - Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros I guess that you might want to change that in libvpx first to keep differences to minimum. - URL is wrong: compat-libvpx1.i686: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.webmproject.org/tools/vp8-sdk/ HTTP Error 404: Not Found - formatting: compat-libvpx1.src:120: W: macro-in-comment %doc compat-libvpx1.src:5: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 5) Rest of rpmlint output (nothing interesting): compat-libvpx1.i686: W: no-documentation compat-libvpx1.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/libvpx.so.1.3.0 0775L srpm/compat-libvpx1.spec:61: W: configure-without-libdir-spec srpm/compat-libvpx1.spec:63: W: configure-without-libdir-spec Please fix those minor issues at your convenience. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review