Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xar - The eXtensible ARchiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241758 ------- Additional Comments From matthias@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-31 05:06 EST ------- - Buildroot : "should", not "must", I'm getting tired of this one :-/ - Duplicate buildrequires : Not really. The package checks explicitly for both, it's not if it was only relying on libxml2 and indirectly on zlib. I see no harm or problems in having both, and prefer like this in case the software switches to some other xml library in the future, which doesn't pull in zlib. - I don't recall any policy making docs mandatory in devel packages. You're probably relying on rpmlint output. The xar sources don't contain any API docs, so the devel package doesn't either. Thanks for taking the time to review, and so quickly too :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review