[Bug 1240116] Review Request: python-music21 - A toolkit for computational musicology

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240116

Javier Peña <jpena@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jpena@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #4 from Javier Peña <jpena@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Please be aware that this is an informal review.

I have some comments about the spec file:

- I think it might be better to fetch the source code directly from GitHub or
PyPi. I have been doing some tests using
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/m/%{pypi_name}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}.tar.gz
and it works fine for me (with some details, see below).

- At least on the PyPi source, license is included in a license.txt file
together with the sources, so you can use "%license
%{python2_sitelib}/music21/license.txt" with it.

- I see the sources include some external libraries in music.ext, and your spec
file patches them manually using sed to avoid library bundling. Is there any
open request upstream to avoid this?

- rpmlint complains twice about macro-in-comment, and mixed spaces and tabs in
line 29.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]