Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: flex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225758 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-30 01:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > After some disussion with other FPC folks, I realized that recent changes to the > static library packaging guidelines require only that linking against static > libraries receive a FESCo ack. Which means we'll have to look at getting some > sort of blanket exception for flex-using applications, You should understand that flex package is devel package and must contain a libfl* to work correctly. However, in libfl* is such kind of trivial, that it hasn't seen any changes for years and is very unlikely to see any changes ever. Furthermore, libfl is almost never used by real world applications, because they typically replace it. I.e. the correct way to ship flex is to package "a libfl*" into flex. If it's libfl.a, so be it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review