[Bug 1237217] Review Request: erlang-eper - Erlang Performance and Debugging Tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237217



--- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> ---
* Named correctly
* Packaged latest version
* The commit matches the version tag
* The license is fine for Fedora
* Builds fine in mock

A couple of remarks:

0.) The license tag looks incorrect

I believe what's in COPYING is a MIT license.

1.) Are these really needed?

> BuildRequires:  erlang >= R14B
...
> Requires:       erlang

Wouldn't it make more sense to just pull in the required modules instead of an
entire stack?

2.) Please use %license tag instead o %doc for COPYING

It makes the installation a bit more compact:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use_license_macro_in_RPMs_for_packages_in_Cloud_Image

3.) Why you don't install the tools in %_bindir?

How are they run?

Btw if you choose to install them in %_bindir, note that gperf and ntop collide
with existing tools -- you might need to rename them ("eper-gperf", ...).

4.) Please s/MacOs/MacOS X/ in %description

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]