https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 --- Comment #14 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13) > - unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings persist. I was experimenting with several different options. To fix this, it would be required to do a complete audit to know what can be dlopen'ed and patch pkg-config files to not add unused libraries to its --libs output. I experimented with some libtool patches as well, but without patching pkg-config files it will not work very well. This would not be trivial, and would need upstream to correct it; as it is now it is not wrong, just that it links to, what the direct dependency libraries link to. > Also there are various 'undefined symbol' related to linkages of libipopt > and libBonCouenne libraries i think, even if libOS.so.6.9.2 seems correctly > linked to them. I did not see any "undefined symbol" log. Please post an example. The library is linked with -no-undefined, so, it may have been some false positive. > - 'LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license' is a false positive. > I don't know why comes out. I could not find a way to make %license work in rhel5 BTW, the way it is supposed to fix by redefining %license to %doc does not work there; it expands the License tag... Overall, I believe at first it would be better to remove the LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -Wl,--as-needed" attempt, and report upstream about overlinking, what is not really an error, and the "fixes" for it most times cause unexpected side effects, and are not applied in upstream packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review