https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230968 --- Comment #8 from William Moreno <williamjmorenor@xxxxxxxxx> --- I understand your point, I really hate this python 2 and python 3 ecosystem. I am packaging livereload as a depency for mkdocs and mkdocs requires livereload as library, i will package mkdos only for python 3: https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/blob/master/setup.py def _livereload(host, port, config, builder, site_dir): # We are importing here for anyone that has issues with livereload. Even if # this fails, the --no-livereload alternative should still work. But I do not want to skip the package in a libs package so this is really a small package. Also epel do not have python3 s default and want to add this package in epel. I can add Provides: livereload in the python 3 package and rename the executable in {_bindir} to livereload-python2 so user can get the python 3 package with dnf install -y livereload and keep the python 2 support for apps than requires python 2 live reload. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review