https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230874 --- Comment #19 from Severin Gehwolf <sgehwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #18) > (In reply to Severin Gehwolf from comment #17) > > > Please, not rename aid or gIg of the plugin, if this does not cause the > > > failure of the build. This changes create difficulties in its use only and > > > not meant to exist. > > > > The aId:gId pairs have not been changed, but the proposed name of the > > package in fedora (maven-scr-plugin vs. felix-src-maven-plugin). Changing > > aId:gId would be something to do upstream first. > > Then it makes few sense to rename the package. > Needless to wrap your head if it is not broken. :) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming What's your point exactly? It's not in fedora yet, so IMHO it makes more sense to call it <foo>-maven-plugin rather than maven-<foo>-plugin since it's not a plugin with group ID org.apache.maven.plugins. Both would satisfy naming guidelines. There are already example packages in fedora: jetty-version-maven-plugin port-allocator-maven-plugin exec-maven-plugin cobertura-maven-plugin felix-scr-maven-plugin makes sense to me since it doesn't use gId org.apache.maven.plugins but has org.apache.felix and it's actually an upstream bug that they don't follow maven plug-in's naming conventions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review