https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175023 --- Comment #24 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #18) > (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #16) > > [MUSTFIX] > > Package name does not comply to Fedora package naming conventions. Please > > rename this package. > > > > It's Fedora convention to name packages after the upstream tarball's name, > > which as I understand your spec is "Oggify": > > ... > > %global project Oggify > > .. > > Source0: http://gbcox.fedorapeople.org/%{name}/%{project}-%{version}.tar.gz > > ... > > > > If you want to, you can add "oggify*" through appropriate explicit > > "Provides", instead. > > This is not consistent with the package naming guidelines, which express a > preference for lower-case names: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity. > > A case could be made for requiring the name to be "python-oggify" or > "python-Oggify", since the package ships a python egg. However, since the > package also contains a binary in %{_bindir}, the packaging guidelines give > enough latitude for the maintainer to choose any of these names, at the > maintainer's discretion: > - oggify > - Oggify > - python-oggify > - python-Oggify > > It's really up to you, Gerald, although if upstream has expressed a > preference with regards to capitalization, that would carry a lot of weight. I do not agree with this interpretation and contine to insist on you to rename the packages. Feel free to file a ticket with FPC to have the situation clarified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review