https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175023 --- Comment #18 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #16) > [MUSTFIX] > Package name does not comply to Fedora package naming conventions. Please > rename this package. > > It's Fedora convention to name packages after the upstream tarball's name, > which as I understand your spec is "Oggify": > ... > %global project Oggify > .. > Source0: http://gbcox.fedorapeople.org/%{name}/%{project}-%{version}.tar.gz > ... > > If you want to, you can add "oggify*" through appropriate explicit > "Provides", instead. This is not consistent with the package naming guidelines, which express a preference for lower-case names: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity. A case could be made for requiring the name to be "python-oggify" or "python-Oggify", since the package ships a python egg. However, since the package also contains a binary in %{_bindir}, the packaging guidelines give enough latitude for the maintainer to choose any of these names, at the maintainer's discretion: - oggify - Oggify - python-oggify - python-Oggify It's really up to you, Gerald, although if upstream has expressed a preference with regards to capitalization, that would carry a lot of weight. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review