[Bug 237334] Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request:  perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for RSA support


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237334


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-05-26 02:16 EST -------
I put the dependencies in a local repo so I could get this built.  It will be
nice when rawhide is rawhide again.

I note that 0.25 has come out since you submitted this review.  (It never
fails.)  I don't think it will significantly affect the packaging, but I note
that the author has added a LICENSE file which you will need to package.  I'll
proceed to review 0.24 but if you'd like me to review a 0.25 package as well,
just post it and I'll do so.

* source files match upstream:
   5de946bf19cd96317418a422a44cb0ebea6e17e42ef1485489e67df0a6acb259  
   Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.24.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (including all modules used by the tests)
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   RSA.so()(64bit)
   perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA) = 0.24
   perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA = 0.24-3.fc7
  =
   libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
   libssl.so.6()(64bit)
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(AutoLoader)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::Random)
   perl(DynaLoader)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=3, Tests=137,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.20 cusr +  0.03 csys =  0.23 CPU)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la droppings.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]