https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177857 --- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #16) > ====== Questions/issues ====== > > python2-libsedml name is a violation of guidelines, imho. It should be > python-libsedml. You're right. > > Why does java-libsedml require libsedml-devel? Shouldn't it be libsedml? Neither of the two. I thought that Java library was linked to a library in /usr/lib?; actually java provides an own 'libsbmlj.so' installed in /usr/lib?. See http://sbml.org/Software/libSBML/docs/cpp-api/libsbml-installation.html#locations > > > I'd use the same license and doc dirs for all subpackages: %global > > _docdir_fmt %{name}. > In particular, since every sub package has the same set of files, if a user > installed all subpackages, and they wanted to look at the documentation, > they would simply waste time before they realized that all the READMEs are > identical. > Done. Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSEDML/libsedml.spec SRPM URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSEDML/libsedml-0.3.0-8.20150422git235bb5.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review