https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223627 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- NON blocking ISSUES: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1223627-gap-pkg-edim/srpm/review- gap-pkg-edim/licensecheck.txt MPLv1.1: edim/doc/mathml.css license field should changed in: GPLv2+ and MPLv1.1 gap-pkg-edim.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/gap-pkg-edim/GPL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address Please, report this problem to upstream minor issues: gap-pkg-edim.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/lib/gap/pkg/edim/doc/edim.bib gap-pkg-edim.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/lib/gap/pkg/edim/doc/edim.bbl Please, fix before import -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review