Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Digest-SHA -- Perl support for SHA digests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237337 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-24 18:04 EST ------- 1) description cuts word in two "Stan- dard". Can you change the formatting of that? 2) %{__perl} needs to get OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" 3) installed binary does not work: # shasum /usr/bin/shasum read() on unopened filehandle at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Digest/base.pm line 24. OK rpmlint is clean OK package properly named OK licence is opensource and matches upstream, copliant with legal req. OK license included in %doc OK spec file uses american english and is legitable OK upstream sources matches md5sum of source in srpm. OK packages builds on x86_64/i385 OK BuildRequires correct, package builds in mock OK no direct /locale/ use OK no use of ldconfig needed OK not relocatable OK no duplicate files or bad permissions (rpmlint is quit) OK files section has defattr. OK consistent use of macros OK clean removes buildroot OK no large docs in package OK doc doesnt affect runtime OK no headers outside -devel package OK no static libs OK dependancies on itself OK no libtool *.la files OK no GUI files OK does not own other packages' files OK cleans buildroot before install OK valid UTF-8 Can you see what the deal with 3) is? And fix 1) and 2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review