https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781 Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |projects.rg@xxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #1) > NOTE: This version is nearly a complete rewrite from the previously dead > upstream, therefore the existing zipios++ package needs to remain in Fedora > until upstreams move to this version. Please use a better package name that would not lead to any misunderstanding about compatibility. Both packages will have the same upstream. Upstream name is clearly zipios++ and not just zipios (you have to mind the ++). Common way for multiple versions of the same package is to add the major version into the name. If you fear to get version conflict, you can add a virtual Provides: zipios++ . Are both versions API compatible? Better suggestion: zipios++2 (2 to clearly identicate that is version 2) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Conflicting_Package_Names -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review