Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-24 12:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > (In reply to comment #25) > > > Well, > > > > > > * Patching Makefile.am requires > > > - to call "autoreconf" in %build stage > > > - to add "Requires: libtool" > > > - And please write "Patch0: ..." and "%patch0 ....." > > > > I will commit the changes upstream (I am the upstream maintainer), > > so no patch > > required. There is a shell script called autogen.sh which > > makes sure the system > > has the correct version of the autotools before running autoreconf. > > Okay. Then if you release new tarball (1.1.2), it is not a problem. Is it necessary to re-version from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2? 1.1.1 has not yet been officially released. I'd like to get all of these changes for fedora extras into 1.1.1. > > > * For Requires problem of mozldap-devel against cyrus-sasl-devel, > > > please see my comment (bug 240516 comment 2) > So please add "BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel" to this package > (adminutil). But I thought since adminutil does not use any cyrus-sasl include files nor link directly to any cyrus-sasl libs, it doesn't need BuildRequires: cyrus-sasl-devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review