https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222272 --- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski <shawn.iwinski@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #4) > [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > You cannot obsolete yourself (see rpmlint warning) > I think it is safe to drop the provide (php-Pimple still exists) > and package using it, should use composer require. > > [!]: Package does not generate any conflict. > As this package is not PSR-0 compliant, perhaps you can > use another top dir (ex /usr/share/php/Pimple1) and thus > avoid the conflicts with new version ? I was against this when I first read it, but the more I thought about it the more I liked it. Implemented. Diff = https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/2bff02a18a7c12c39c8be74973266f4451ca19f1 > I can't test what happens when php-pimple1 and php-Pimple 3 are in the repo. > Will the package be update, or replace ? adamwill updated php-Pimple for owncloud -- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/php-Pimple-3.0.0 Note that for the long-run I still want to move ahead with bug 1131731 so the extension is available as well. I will update that review request soon. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/2bff02a18a7c12c39c8be74973266f4451ca19f1/php-pimple1/php-pimple1.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-pimple1-1.1.1-3.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review