[Bug 1215344] Review Request: plowshare-modules-legacy - Legacy modules for plowshare

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215344

Elder Marco <eldermarco@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |eldermarco@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from Elder Marco <eldermarco@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hello Pavel, thank you!

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/plowshare,
     /usr/share/plowshare/modules

Those directories belongs to plowshare package. Maybe, the package (and
plowshare) must own the directory /usr/share/plowshare/modules. (?)


[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: %defattr present but not needed

I want to submit the package to EPEL. I think the section is needed in this
case.

[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
     Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Buildroot is not present
     Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
     Note: %clean present but not required

I want to submit the package to EPEL. I think the section is needed in this
case.


[!]: Latest version is packaged.
Latest commit 098d61824beb108d146cfa5b73eb8d9b05400fe3 and I do not see any
tags or releases.

There are no tags or releases.


Main issue: Offsite (https://github.com/mcrapet/plowshare-modules-legacy) said
it "Plowshare legacy & unmaintained modules". So, it useless for packaging. Do
you plan maintain that repository if author do not willing do that? It is stop
issue.
As we discuss in mail list apparently you should choose different method of
packaging that.

No, I don't. The core package depends on the modules, since it will not work
without them. Thus, maintaining a base package without modules does not make
any sense, in my opinion. This is the repository which users can install
locally through plowmod.

Thank you!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]