https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193923 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment #9) Thank you for your comments. I *was* hoping that somebody more knowledgeable would look at this. > It would also show that polarssl-devel.x86_64 and polarssl-devel.i686 suffer > from an implicit conflict. Please test mbedtls-devel for such a conflict > during this review. Testing now... mbedtls and mbedtls-devel from x86_64 and i686 can be installed without any trouble. So can mbedtls-utils.x86_64 and mbedtls-utils.i686, and rpm -V says they are both fine, which I don't understand at all. Is this some rpm magic? > As the reviewer, you should have done that prior to requesting the submitter > to change something. I disagree here. I think it's acceptable for the reviewer to point out an issue without knowing how to, and without trying to, solve it. If I can, I'll definitely try to help, but sometimes I'm not able to devote the time necessary to propose a solution. Anyway, all issues seem to be solved. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review