[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Xavier, are you taking the review?

Some notes from fedora-review:
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires)

- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file LICENSE.txt is marked as %doc instead of %license
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- lets-encrypt.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-1.git1d8281d.fc20
['0-1.git1d8281d.fc23', '0-1.git1d8281d']
- lets-encrypt.noarch: W: invalid-license ASL

Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing for a
list.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]