[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013

Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #48 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
* Modifying license file downstream
  - Well, even if rpmlint complains somehow, I am strongly
    against modifying license text downstream arbitrarily.
    License text change must be done upstream.

    Please pull the _actual_ upstream fix with the URL:

   
https://github.com/rofl0r/proxychains-ng/commit/567935b1abb93af561600081461a46b89468b9ca

* Relation with "proxychains"
(In reply to Till Maas from comment #29)
> (In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #28)
> 
> > Is proxychanins-ng going to replace proxychains? or is it installable in
> > parallel? I must have missed that in my earlier comment.
> 
> sorry for the confusion. proxychains-ng is meant to replace proxychains i.e.
> the current plan is to retire proxychains when this review is finished.

  - Then please add some "Obsoletes" entry against proxychains.
  * NOTE:
    - Currently %_sysconfdir/proxychains.conf is also owned by
      the "old" proxychains, so installing both proxychains and
      proxychains-ng sees a conflict on %_sysconfdir/proxychains.conf .

      Anyway, adding "Obsoletes" or "Conflicts" against proxychains
      is currently needed (unless config file on proxychains-ng
      is changed).

* Distro-specific configuration
> Adjust ~/.proxychains/proxychains.conf for your Proxy and use ProxyChains NG
> with
> proxychains4 application
  - If this application cannot be used as it is and some configuration
    by user is needed, I think some explanation file like "README.fedora"
    or so should be created, such explanation is not suitable for writing
    in Summary or %description.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]