https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > License: BSD https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Licensing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > Patch0: cppformat_so_name.patch > Patch1: cppformat_lib64.patch https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Patch_Guidelines > %files doc > %doc doc/html/ > %package doc > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} Even if the guidelines don't say anything about it [yet], please keep plain documentation packages free from superfluous dependencies. This -doc package certainly does _not_ need the base library package to be installed. It is much more convenient, if documentation packages can be installed without pulling in unnecessary dependency-chains. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review