https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210983 Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- * Rpmlint can safely be ignored: python3-vcrpy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yaml -> yam, yams, yawl python3-vcrpy.noarch: W: no-documentation python-vcrpy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-contextlib2 python-vcrpy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python3-contextlib2 python-vcrpy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yaml -> yam, yams, yawl python-vcrpy.noarch: W: no-documentation python-vcrpy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yaml -> yam, yams, yawl python-vcrpy.src:135: W: macro-in-comment %doc python-vcrpy.src:136: W: macro-in-comment %license python-vcrpy.src:144: W: macro-in-comment %doc python-vcrpy.src:145: W: macro-in-comment %license 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 9 warnings. * Spec is clean * License is MIT and is shipped in the sources ! The LICENSE and README file can now be marked as %doc * No bundle in the sources * Builds cleanly on F22 (via mock) (not in F21 but that's likely an updates-testing issue) * Consistent usage of the macros * Upstream sources: 6f40f3e0fbde03ca44ccdff2711cac39dcd6d2354795582f8bf6f98376fa0b62 vcrpy-1.4.2.tar.gz * srpm sources: 6f40f3e0fbde03ca44ccdff2711cac39dcd6d2354795582f8bf6f98376fa0b62 python-vcrpy-1.4.2-1.fc21.src/vcrpy-1.4.2.tar.gz This looks all good to me This package is APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review