Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adminutil - Utility library for Fedora Directory Server administration Alias: adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235293 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-23 10:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > * What are the lines of "BuildRequires" on -devel package? > They are the packages required to build the adminutil-devel package? There seems to be some confusion. "BuildRequires" is the packages which are required to rebuild this (adminutil) package and they should be written at the part of the summary of main package (as you wrote them). There is no need to write duplicate BuildRequires. What is actually needed is to write "Requires" for -devel package. For example, adminutil.pc.in contains the line: ----------------------------------------------- Requires: nspr, nss, svrcore, mozldap, icu ----------------------------------------------- This means -devel package should have "Requires" (not BuildRequires) nspr-devel, nss-devel, ........ Check the section "Requires" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > > > * Is this package parellel make unsafe? > > Not that I know of. Why? Please refer to the section "Parallel make" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review