[Bug 1208840] Re-Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208840

Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
           See Also|                            |https://bugzilla.redhat.com
                   |                            |/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
                   |                            |32818
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
            Summary|Review Request:             |Re-Review Request:
                   |gdouros-musica-fonts - A    |gdouros-musica-fonts - A
                   |font for musical symbols    |font for musical symbols
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Review:

+ mock build is successful for F23 (x86_64)

+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
gdouros-musica-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs ->
glyph, glyph s
gdouros-musica-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs ->
glyph, glyph s
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm Source0: 7aeab12245ab3959b1a81abd6477e121522db5ad304ed952faea10b4731d5bb1
upstream Source0 :
7aeab12245ab3959b1a81abd6477e121522db5ad304ed952faea10b4731d5bb1
srpm Source1 : c823bc3a4802ac6096d8673048d1f36008718090a3dc46b7d6ce5f22cc699a66
upstream Source1 :
c823bc3a4802ac6096d8673048d1f36008718090a3dc46b7d6ce5f22cc699a66

+ License is "Public Domain" as per given on upstream website "Fonts and
documents in this site are not pieces of property or merchandise items; they
carry no trademark, copyright, license or other market tags; they are free for
any use". So no license text is included in font file or any text file

+ follows fonts packaging guidelines.

+ fontconfig file is present at priority 65.

+ Appdata metainfo file is present.

Package APPROVED.

You want to submit here package change request to own this package. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]