https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177442 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #4) > Sorry for delay, have been away for a spring holiday. > > Basically all looks OK. > > The naming is a bit awkward. If the "real" jbosh which this is forked from > ever get packaged, this fork have acquired the generic name. I think this > should have a naming which not is plain jbosh for this reason. No guidelines > to refer to besides "apply common sense". Hoping that no one is the idea to package the "real" jbosh, i prefer keep the current name. Some reasons no import com.kenai.jbosh: - 1 unmaintained (latest update almost 4 years ago Version to 0.6.0 ) - 2 use old libraries, org.xlightweb:xlightweb is also unmaintained -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review