[Bug 1015868] Review Request: python-qutepart - Source code text editor component based on Qt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868

Yajo <yajo.sk8@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(yajo.sk8@xxxxxxxx |
                   |m)                          |



--- Comment #11 from Yajo <yajo.sk8@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #9)
> * Please use consistently the provided macros, also for the upstream project
> name. You can use the %{url} macro to shorten additional links.
> %global project qutepart
> …

Done.


> * As this package is related to python2, you should use also the respective
> macros to avoid any confusion. Python2 is still the default but will change
> in near future to Python3. What about use python3 today? If yes, please
> adjust BuildRequires, too.

Done.


> %license LICENSE
> * Please use the %license macro for the license text, see my correction
> above.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
> 
> * Do you plan packages for EPEL or Fedora 20? If yes, that usage of %license
> macro will be problematic and needs some tweaking. Please let me know if you
> need further help.

AFAIK it only applies when upstream does not provide a LICENSE file. This is
not the case.

BTW, the docs are contradictory.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text says:

  "These prefixes are not valid in Fedora: %license and %readme."


> * Do you plan packages for EPEL or Fedora 20? If yes, that usage of %license macro will be problematic and needs some tweaking. Please let me know if you need further help.

I'm not planning those packages, but if somebody asks for it, I could try for
EPEL. F20 is too close to death.

> I'll update the respective bug fields to keep this open as a review request, see comment #7.

Thank you very much.

SPEC URL:
https://build.opensuse.org/source/home:yajo:enki/python-qutepart/python-qutepart.spec?rev=c390ab9e845d91b99b1d74e76ac3fbf7

SRPM URL:
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/yajo:/enki/RHEL_7/src/python-qutepart-2.2.0-6.1.src.rpm

That one is for RHEL, but I think the SRPM will be the same. If not, I can put
the URL to the Fedora one once OBS finises the job.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]