[Bug 1208835] Re-Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208835



--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #2)
> 1) I propose to follow
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-
> Release_packages with following changes
> 
> %global checkout 20150430
> 
> Release:        0.2.%{checkout}%{?dist}

a) Why is the leading zero necessary?
b) Is it OK to use the date on which I downloaded the font as opposed to the
date on which it was updated?


> The reason why I am not considering 7.15 as version is that it can be
> mistake by upstream to write the archive as 7.15.

So I should pay attention only to the version number declared inside the font
and not the one on his website?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]