[Bug 1214840] Review Request: python-statsd - Python client for the statsd daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214840

Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #11 from Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> ---
To answer Alex
> Could you please elaborate a bit how this applies here?

Not much, that's just one of the rule that I never fully understood and decided
to just follow fedora-review. The idea is to make sure the right doc is pulled
on multiarch, etc, but in practice, I am not sure that's a problem except in
some corner case ( or maybe I am wrong )


And sorry Tristan, My bad, forgot to set the flag

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]