https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214002 John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(linville@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Regarding the release tag: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages "Snapshot packages contain data about where the snapshot came from as well as ordering information for rpm. The information about the snapshot will be called %{checkout} in this section. %{checkout} consists of the date that the snapshot is made in YYYYMMDD format, a short (2-5 characters) string identifying the type of revision control system or that this is a snapshot, and optionally, up to 13 characters (ASCII) alphanumeric characters that could be useful in finding the revision in the revision control system." So, I think that while 20150416hg6f0dcb7087fe is ugly, it meets the guidelines. :-) Regarding the license documentation: I met with the primary developer of the package this weekend and explained the desire for more thorough licene documentation. However, he mostly shrugged off the concern and pointed-out that the code has been marked as Public Domain on Sourceforge for roughly 15 years, with no complaints from anyone. I don't expect that they will take any action on that issue. :-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review